Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.65 seconds)
Randhir Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 February, 1982 cites

Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi vs Union Of India & Ors on 11 April, 1961

Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India is not itself of any real assistance to us since what was decided there was that there could be different scales of pay for different grades of a service. It is well known that there can be and there are different grades in a service, with varying qualifications for entry into a particular grade, the higher grade often being a promotional avenue for officers of the lower grade. The higher qualifications for the higher grade, which may be either academic qualifications or experience based on length of service, reasonably sustain the classification of the officers into two grades with different scales of pay. The principle of equal pay for equal work would be an abstract doctrine not attracting Art. 14 if sought to be applied to them.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 94 - Full Document

Makhan Singh vs Union Of India And Ors. on 5 August, 1974

Our attention was drawn to Binoy Kumar Mukerjee v. Union of India, Makhan Singh v. Union of India & Ors. where reference was made to the observations of this Court in Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India describing the principle of equal pay for equal work as an abstract doctrine which had nothing to do with Art. 14. We shall presently point out how the principle, "equal pay for equal work" is not an abstract doctrine but one of substance.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Binoy Kumar Mukerjee vs Union Of India on 27 October, 1972

Our attention was drawn to Binoy Kumar Mukerjee v. Union of India, Makhan Singh v. Union of India & Ors. where reference was made to the observations of this Court in Kishori Mohanlal Bakshi v. Union of India describing the principle of equal pay for equal work as an abstract doctrine which had nothing to do with Art. 14. We shall presently point out how the principle, "equal pay for equal work" is not an abstract doctrine but one of substance.
Delhi High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - Full Document
1