Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Ajmer Singh vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2010
In Ajmer Singh vs. State of Haryana
(2010) 3 SCC 746, it was held that in such
circumstances the Court will have to determine
whether the evidence of the police officer "was
believable after taking due care and caution in
evaluating their evidence". In the present case, given
the shoddy investigation, the failure to associate any
independent witness constituted an additional factor to
disbelieve the case of the prosecution."
The Arms Act, 1959
The Coinage Act, 2011
Section 39 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Thakur Rajinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 27 April, 2012
In 'Thakur Singh V. State
of Punjab' 1996 CRI L.J. 3606 it was held that
conviction on basis of evidence of police officials
cannot be set aside, where police officials having no
hostility towards the accused. Presumption that
person acts honestly applies also to police officials.
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Radhey Shyam Aggarwal vs State N.C.T. Delhi on 6 February, 2009
In Radhey Shyam v State (NCT of Delhi)
Criminal Appeal No. 302/2008 decided on 25.04.2011; Hon'ble
Delhi High Court observed as under:-
Mohd. Irfan vs Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence on 8 November, 2013
In Mohd. Irfan v Directorate of Revenue
Intelligence, Crl. Appeal No. 783/12 decided on 8th November,
2013; Hon'ble Delhi High Court has observed as under:-