Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.65 seconds)
Gurpreet Singh vs State Of Haryana on 12 September, 2002 cites

Arvind Singh vs State Of Bihar on 26 April, 2001

In the appeal against the order of conviction and sentence, the High Court rejected the contentions in support of the appeal with a positive finding that there exists sufficient circumstantial evidence on record to connect the accused with the sordid crime he committed. Before proceeding further however and since the injuries as noticed above relate to burn, we feel it expedient to note the observations of this Court in Arvind Singh v. State of Bihar (2001 (6) SCC 407) wherein one of us (Banerjee, J.) dealt with such injuries in quite some detail. This Court observed :
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 139 - Full Document

Thakur Prasad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 January, 1953

Next, however, is the plea of alibi as raised by the appellant when the husband stated that after the dinner he alongwith a friend went to Gymkhana Club for a coffee and it is only at the club that he was informed of the fire in the house which prompted the appellant to return to his house immediately. This plea of alibi stands disbelieved by both the courts and since the plea of alibi is a question of fact and since both the courts concurrently found that facts against the appellant, the accused, this Court in our view, cannot on an appeal by special leave go behind the above noted concurrence finding of fact. This stands well settled for about five decades and reference may be made to the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad vs. State of Madhya Pradesh(1954 Crl.Law Journal 261).
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 20 - G Hasan - Full Document
1