Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.43 seconds)Section 58 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Section 57 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Lakha Ram Sharma vs Balar Marketing Pvt. Ltd. on 1 August, 2003
24. It is now relevant to state and reiterate the law of amendment
of plaint. The merit of the case is immaterial and cannot be looked into
while considering an application for amendment, which is clearly stated
in Lakha Ram Sharma v. Balar Marketing Pvt. Ltd. 2003 (27) PTC
175 (SC).
Section 31 in The Patents Act, 1970 [Entire Act]
Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal & Ors vs K.K. Modi & Ors on 22 March, 2006
It is further trite that the correctness and falsity of the
amendment cannot also be gone into at the stage of the amendment
(Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal and Ors. v. K.K. Modi and Ors. (2006) 4
SCC 385).
Usha Devi vs Rijwan Ahamd & Ors on 17 January, 2008
Further, in Usha Devi v. Rijwan Ahmad & Ors. AIR 2008
SC 1147 it was held as follows:-
1