Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.56 seconds)
M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Indian Railway Catering And Tourism ... on 5 April, 2019
cites
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Railways Act, 1989
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 50 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Section 56 in The Railways Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
Som Prakash Rekhi vs Union Of India & Anr on 13 November, 1980
76. Reliance is placed on R.D. Shetty vs. the International Airport
Authority, AIR 1979 SC 1628; Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravarddi,
(1981) 1 SCC 722; Som Prakash vs. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 212 to
state that respondent No.1 is an instrumentality of state and therefore,
amenable to writ jurisdiction.
Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
Further, reliance is placed on Tata Cellular vs.
UOI, (1994) 6 SCC 651, Harbanslal Sahnia vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(2003) 2 SCC 107; ABL Intl.
Harbanslal Sahnia And Anr. vs Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. And Ors. on 20 December, 2002
Further, reliance is placed on Tata Cellular vs.
UOI, (1994) 6 SCC 651, Harbanslal Sahnia vs. Indian Oil Corporation
(2003) 2 SCC 107; ABL Intl.
The Chairman, Railway Board & Ors vs Mrs. Chandrima Das & Ors on 28 January, 2000
Reliance is also placed on (i) Chairman
Railway Board and Anr. vs. Chandrima Das and Ors. (2000) 2 SCC 465; (ii)
Noble Resources Ltd. v. State of Orissa and Anr. (2006) 10 SCC 236; (iii)
M.P. State Agro Industries Development Corp. Ltd. and Anr. v. Jahan Khan
(2007) 10 SCC 88; (iv) Saraswati Deswal vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
(2010) 2 SCC 126 to state that availability of alternative remedy would not be
bar to exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution by this
Court, if actions of the respondent are shown to be manifestly unfair,
arbitrary, unjust, non-transparent and discriminatory.