Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)
Sri A Sadashivaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 December, 2022 cites

Sadhana Lodh vs National Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr on 24 January, 2003

6. There is force in the submission of learned HCGP that the Tribunal comprises of a Sr. Judicial officer of the District Judge cadre and a Selection Grade Officer from the IAS cadre. The appeal is both on law and facts and all aspects having been scrupulously looked into, the Petitioners' appeal has been negatived vide order dated 13.10.2013 and therefore, the writ court exercising a limited supervisory jurisdiction constitutionally vested under Article 227 cannot undertake a deeper examination vide SADHANA LODH VS. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, (2003) 3 SCC 527.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1434 - Full Document

Harbhajan Singh vs Karam Singh And Others on 16 September, 1965

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the Petition papers, this court is broadly in agreement with the submission made on behalf of the Respondents inasmuch as the Asst. Commissioner had dropped the confiscatory proceedings vide order dated 13.11.2013; it is a statutory order and the Act does not vest power in Asst. Commissioner to review the said order. The Apex Court in the case of HARBHAJAN SINGH VS. KARAM SINGH AIR 1966 SC 641 has held that a statutory order exercising quasi-judicial power becomes functus officio once the order is made and he cannot review his decision in the absence of statutory enablement therefor.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 97 - V Ramaswami - Full Document
1