Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)
Anshul Bansal vs State Of Haryana on 12 October, 2021 cites

Biman Chatterjee vs Sanchita Chatterjee & Anr on 10 February, 2004

In rebuttal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present dispute is primarily a civil dispute and the petitioner was found to be innocent even by the prosecution side and there is no new material to show the involvement of the petitioner. He has also relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Biman Chatterjee Vs. Sanchita Chatterjee and another, CRA-193-2004, decided on 10.02.2004, to contend that mere non-fulfillment of the terms of the compromise cannot be a ground for cancellation of bail. The relevant portion of the judgment is as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 43 - Full Document

Sreelal vs Murali Menon on 10 July, 2014

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the abovesaid case, the compromise was admitted whereas in the present case, it was even disputed. It is further submitted that Kerala High Court in Sreelal Vs. Murali Menon and another, Crl.M.C.-1864-2014 decided on 10.07.2014, has held that the agreement entered into before the Mediation Centre, would not become final till the time there is a seal of the Court and the Criminal Court is not to rely upon the same. The relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereasunder:-
Kerala High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 5 - K Ramakrishnan - Full Document
1