Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)Section 91 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Gudadhur Paul Chowdhry And Ors. vs Bhyrub Chunder Bhuttacharji And Anr. on 12 February, 1880
17. From the entries in the two talub bakis and the furd Ex. A, the inference has been drawn by the Subordinate Judge that the landlord had for 21 or 22 years received sent separately from the defendant No. 2 for his share in the taluq. Even supposing that we could accept the view that the facts support the inference which we do not, of what value is it to support the construction the Sub-ordinate Judge has placed on the receipt? It was distinctly held by this Court in the case of Buloram Paul v. Swoop Chunder Gooho (1874) 21 W.R. 256 that separate payments of rents by different tenants of one tenure did not vary the nature of the tenure.
1