Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.52 seconds)Section 2 in The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
The Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971
Inder Mani & Ors vs Mathehwari Prasad & Ors on 10 October, 1996
More recently, in the case of Inder Mani vs.
Matheshwari Prasad, (1996) 6 SCC 587, a Division Bench of
this Court has opined :
Sohan Lal Baid vs State Of West Bengal And Others on 5 September, 1989
A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in the case
of Sohan lal Baid vs. State of West Bengal, AIR 1990
Calcutta 168 has dealt with this aspect elaborately. After
referring to the provisions of the Government of India Act
1935, the Calcutta High Court Rules and a number of decided
cases, the Bench observed:-
Braj Kishore Thakur vs Union Of India And Others on 24 February, 1997
In the case of Braj Kishore Thakur vs. Union of
India, (1997) 4 SCC 65, while expunging some adverse remarks
made by the High Court against a Judge of the subordinate
court, this Court said:
A.M. Mathur vs Pramod Kumar Gupta on 22 March, 1990
In A. M. Mathur vs. Pramod Kumar Gupta, (1990) 2 SCC
533, this Court said:
State vs Devi Dayal on 18 August, 1958
In State vs. Devi Dayal, AIR 1959 Allahabad 421, a
Division Bench of the Allahabad High court considered the
scope and powers of the Chief Justice under the Constitution
with particular reference to Rule 1 Chapter V of the Rules
of that Court (Which is in pari materia with Rule 54 of The
Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952) and held: per Mukherji,
J.: