Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.38 seconds)
Arvind Cairae & Others vs Union Of India & Others -Respondents on 17 November, 2009 cites

K.M. Abdulla Kunhi And B.L. Abdul Khader vs Union Of India And Ors., State Of ... on 23 January, 1991

2. It is found that in a review of functioning of National Sample Survey Organization in the report of March, 1999 in para 4.1.6 regarding SSS it has been observed that the work requirement in case of data processing assistant requires statistical skills of very higher order and instead of creating separating computer cadre in National Sample Survey Organization they should be encadred in SSS. Acting on it, even an option has been extended to the applicants. However, a decision in WPC No.9680/2006 in M.L. Zutsi v. Union of India, whereby an issue of Grade IV of ISS being encadred was decided, where the export committees report has been relied upon to hold that they are not carrying any functions of statistical side, so are not entitled for inclusion in ISS. This has been the basis of respondents rejection of request of applicants.
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 724 - K J Shetty - Full Document

Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam vs Union Of India & Ors on 14 May, 2009

Moreover, in the matter of policy framing when it is against the rules or against the Constitution, the same has to be interfered, as ruled by the Apex Court in Villianur Iyar Kkai Padukappu Maiyam v. Union of India & Others, 2009 (8) SCALE 310. As we find that as a policy decision ignoring the statistical functions of DPA III and II and basing the rejection on a decision, which does not concern SSS, respondents have not in legal parlance re-considered the issue following the directions of the Tribunal in OA No.812/2007. The order passed cannot sustain in law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 178 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1