Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.30 seconds)

Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India And Others on 4 November, 2019

64. The conclusion so recorded by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Adfert Technologies case [Adfert Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 5701 : 2019-TIOL- 2519-HC-P&H-GST] will have no bearing on the facts of this case in light of the opinion expressed in this judgment, as we have held that consequent to submission/filing of Form GSTR-3B, as This is a digitally signed order.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 88 - Cited by 126 - J Singh - Full Document

M/S Siddharth Enterprises Through ... vs The Nodal Officer on 6 September, 2019

The Punjab and Haryana High Court in Adfert Technologies case [Adfert Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 5701 : 2019-TIOL-2519-HC-P&H-GST] agreed with the view [Siddharth Enterprises v. Nodal Officer, 2019 SCC OnLine Guj 3711 : 2019-TIOL-2068-HC-AHM-GST] taken by the Gujarat High Court and the Delhi High Court [Krish Automotors (P) Ltd.v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10090 : 2019- TIOL-2153-HC-DEL-GST] .
Gujarat High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 29 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

Bharti Airtel Ltd vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2015

65. The High Court in the impugned judgment [Bharti Airtel Ltd. v. Union of India, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 2073] , has also adverted to the decisions of the Delhi High Court in Blue Bird Pure (P) Ltd. v. Union of India[Blue Bird Pure (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 9250] and in Lease Plan India (P) Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi) [Lease Plan India (P) Ltd. v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2019 SCC OnLine Del 11931] . For the same reasons, the conclusion reached in the said two decisions will be of no avail to Respondent 1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 44 - Full Document
1   2 Next