Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.30 seconds)Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Janabai Ranu Patole And Another vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 January, 1997
In support of the contention that on suffering 98% burn
injuries it was not possible for Deceased to give statement, learned
Advocate for the Appellant relied on the Judgment in Janabai Ranu
Patole and Anr vs. The State of Maharashtra, 1997 ALL MR (Cri.) 1157
wherein it is observed as under -
Sampat Babso Kale vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 April, 2019
In the case of Sampat Babso Kale (supra), the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India observed that, 'non-examination of important
witnesses was held to be fatal as it led to non-corroboration of Dying
Declaration.'
Vijay Pal vs State(Gnct)Of Delhi on 10 March, 2015
16. On the other hand, learned Addl. P. P. relied on the
Judgment in Vijay Pal vs. State (GNCT) of Delhi, AIR 2015 SC 1495
wherein following are the observations:
Mafabhai Nagarbhai Raval vs State Of Gujarat on 14 August, 1992
In this regard, we
may profitably refer to the decision in Mafabhai Nagarbhai
Raval v. State of Gujarat wherein it has been held a person
suffering 99% burn injuries could be deemed capable enough
for the purpose of making a dying declaration. The Court in
the said case opined that unless there existed some inherent
and apparent defect, the trial Court should not have
substituted its opinion for that of the doctor. In the light of the
facts of the case, the dying declaration was found to be worthy
of reliance.
State Of M.P vs Dal Singh & Ors on 21 May, 2013
In State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dal Singh and Others,
a two-Judge Bench placed reliance on the dying declaration of
Deceased who had suffered 100% burn injuries on the ground
that the dying declaration was found to be credible."
Waikhom Yaima Singh vs State Of Manipur on 18 April, 2011
(a) Waikhom Yaima Singh vs. State of Manipur, 2011
ALL MR (Cri.) 2048 (S.C.)