Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.71 seconds)Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Hariprasad Shivshankar Shukla vs A.D. Divikar (With Connected Appeal) on 27 November, 1956
The learned Judges took the view that the definition of the term retrenchment as found in Section 2(oo) had to be read as limited or rectricted in terms of the decision in Hariprasad Shivshankar Shukla v. A. D. Divelkar A.I.R. 1957 S.C. 121, to which we have already adverted. Referring to that decision the learned Judges said thus:
The Buckingham And Carnatic Co. Ltd vs Venkatiah And Anr on 2 August, 1963
We have anxiously gone through the Supreme Court decisions referred to by the learned Judges and we are unable to find any consideration of the question of retrenchment in any of these decisions, In none of those cases the question whether Section 2(oo) of the Act will apply in a case where the termination is in accordance with the standing orders applicable to the employer and the employees is seen to have arisen for decision. Reference is seen made to the decisions in N. E.L. and P. Co. Ltd. v. Shreepathirao , Chartered Bank v. Chartered Bank Employees Union 1960-II L.L.J. , U.B. Dutt and Co. v. Its Workmen , Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatiah , and Murugan Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal .
Management Of Murgugan Mills Ltd vs Industrial Tribunal Madras And Anotmr on 11 November, 1964
We have anxiously gone through the Supreme Court decisions referred to by the learned Judges and we are unable to find any consideration of the question of retrenchment in any of these decisions, In none of those cases the question whether Section 2(oo) of the Act will apply in a case where the termination is in accordance with the standing orders applicable to the employer and the employees is seen to have arisen for decision. Reference is seen made to the decisions in N. E.L. and P. Co. Ltd. v. Shreepathirao , Chartered Bank v. Chartered Bank Employees Union 1960-II L.L.J. , U.B. Dutt and Co. v. Its Workmen , Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatiah , and Murugan Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal .
The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
The Payment Of Wages Act, 1936
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
The Chartered Bank, Bombay vs The Chartered Bank Employees' Union on 4 April, 1960
We have anxiously gone through the Supreme Court decisions referred to by the learned Judges and we are unable to find any consideration of the question of retrenchment in any of these decisions, In none of those cases the question whether Section 2(oo) of the Act will apply in a case where the termination is in accordance with the standing orders applicable to the employer and the employees is seen to have arisen for decision. Reference is seen made to the decisions in N. E.L. and P. Co. Ltd. v. Shreepathirao , Chartered Bank v. Chartered Bank Employees Union 1960-II L.L.J. , U.B. Dutt and Co. v. Its Workmen , Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatiah , and Murugan Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal .
The Management Of U.B. Dutt & Co vs Workmen Of U.B. Dutt & Co on 29 January, 1962
We have anxiously gone through the Supreme Court decisions referred to by the learned Judges and we are unable to find any consideration of the question of retrenchment in any of these decisions, In none of those cases the question whether Section 2(oo) of the Act will apply in a case where the termination is in accordance with the standing orders applicable to the employer and the employees is seen to have arisen for decision. Reference is seen made to the decisions in N. E.L. and P. Co. Ltd. v. Shreepathirao , Chartered Bank v. Chartered Bank Employees Union 1960-II L.L.J. , U.B. Dutt and Co. v. Its Workmen , Buckingham and Carnatic Co. v. Venkatiah , and Murugan Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Tribunal .