cites: 12372452

Satish Dhakad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 January, 2016

10. To avoid such a situation, in our view, powers under Section 451 Cr.P.C. should be exercised promptly and at the earliest.'' 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH CRR 5694/2018 (Satish Dhakad vs. State of M.P. ) Per contra, it is submitted by the counsel for the State that the motorcycle in question was used in dacoity and theft and he opposes the revision.

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs State Of Gujarat on 18 November, 2002

Reliance has also been placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs. State of Gujarat, reported in (2002) 10 SCC 283, in which the Supreme Court has held as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 21090 - Full Document

Smt. Basavva Kom Dyamangouda Patil vs State Of Mysore And Anr. on 19 April, 1977

In Smt. Basawa Kom Dyanmangouda Patil vs. State of Mysore and Another [1977] 4 SCC 358, this Court dealt with a case where the seized articles were not available for being returned to the complainant. In that case, the recovered ornaments were kept in a trunk in the police station and later it was found missing, the question was with regard to payment of those articles. In that context, the Court observed as under-

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 596 - S M Ali - Full Document

Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 37798

Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 42289

Section 451 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 12907

Jagdish Sahu And Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh 49 ... on 15 January, 2018

On the other hand, learned counsel for the applicant submits that motorcycle belongs to the present applicant who has not been identified in the T.I.P. and has also been enlarged on bail. Even otherwise, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the vehicle in custody and allowed it to deteriorate. Applicant, seeks parity with the case of Jagdish Vs. State of M.P. (CRR 5063/2018).

Chattisgarh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - R C Samant - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results