Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.56 seconds)

Kalgonda Babgonda Patil vs Balgonda Kalgonda Patil And Ors. on 15 February, 1989

iii. Kalagonda Babgonda Patil Vs. Balgonda Kalgonda Patil and others reported in AIR 1989 SC 1042, wherein it is held that after abolition of inams, property enures for benefit of Joint Family and its members are entitled to claim partition and possession, since such watan lands were not partitioned earlier and -9- RSA No. 380 of 2022 continued to be joint family estate due to embargo attached to such inam lands and as they were not partible.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Shivappa Tammannappa Karaban vs Parasappa Hanammappa Kuraban And Ors on 22 September, 1994

iv. Shivappa Tammanna Karaban Vs. Parasappa Hanammappa Kuraban and others reported in 1994 AIR SCW 5031, wherein it is held that watan property attached to office of sanadi continues to be Joint family property for benefit of H.U.F. and Watandar has no exclusive right to property. Such property is partible subject to conditions under Sec. 5(3) of K.V.O. Abolition Act, 1961.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

B.L. Sreedhar & Ors vs K.M. Munireddy (Dead) And Ors on 5 December, 2002

2. B.L. Sreedhar and others Vs. K.M. Munireddy reported in AIR 2003 S.C.578, wherein it is held that where an office is attached to joint family, any person holding that office will be holding the same on his behalf and also on behalf of other members of joint family and an interest in office means and includes right to survivorship of members of joint family."
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 173 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 Next