Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.50 seconds)The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 12 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 421 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 26 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
Similarly, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector Land
Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. (Supra) has laid down the following
parameters for the condonation of delay in filing the appeal which are
reproduced as under:-
Vidyawati Gupta & Ors vs Bhakti Hari Nayak & Ors on 3 February, 2006
16. Saket Sikri, Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellant has argued
CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1136 of 2022. It is submitted by him that since the
impugned order was passed on 10.06.2022 and the appeal has been filed on
11.07.2022, therefore, this appeal is within limitation because the period
would start running from 11.06.2022 as the date on which the impugned
order was passed has to be excluded as per Rule 3 and Section 12 of the
Act. In this case also, the certified copy was applied on 12.08.2022, even
after the expiry of total period of 45 days and without filing an application
for seeking exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order.
Counsel for the Appellant has submitted that filing of the certified copy after
the order is passed by the Court is a curable defect and in this regard, he
has referred to a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case
of Vidyawati Gupta and Ors. Vs. Bhakti Hari Nayak and Ors. (2006) 2 SCC
777 and has referred to Paras49 and 50 which is reproduced as under:-
Deepak Bajaj vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 12 November, 2008
In order to appreciate their respective arguments, we shall now refer
to the facts of all the four cases relied upon by the Respondent and the ratio
laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this Appellate Tribunal.