Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.46 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 307 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Jagir Singh And Ors on 6 August, 1973
12. To the same effect is the decisions in State of Punjab v.
Jagir Singh (AIR 1973 SC 2407), Lehna v. State of Haryana
(2002 (3) SCC 76) and Gangadhar Behera and Ors. v. State of
Orissa (2002 (8) SCC 381).
Gangadhar Behera And Ors vs State Of Orissa on 10 October, 2002
12. To the same effect is the decisions in State of Punjab v.
Jagir Singh (AIR 1973 SC 2407), Lehna v. State of Haryana
(2002 (3) SCC 76) and Gangadhar Behera and Ors. v. State of
Orissa (2002 (8) SCC 381).
Babulal Bhagwan Khandare & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 2 December, 2004
13. The above position was also highlighted in Babulal
Bhagwan Khandare and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra [2005
(10) SCC 404] and in Salim Saheb v. State of M.P. (2007(1)
SCC 699).
Salim Sahab vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 December, 2006
13. The above position was also highlighted in Babulal
Bhagwan Khandare and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra [2005
(10) SCC 404] and in Salim Saheb v. State of M.P. (2007(1)
SCC 699).
State Of Rajasthan vs Teja Ram And Ors on 19 March, 1999
14. The over insistence on witnesses having no relation with
the victims often results in criminal justice going awry. When
any incident happens in a dwelling house the most natural
witnesses would be the inmates of that house. It is
unpragmatic to ignore such natural witnesses and insist on
outsiders who would not have even seen any thing. If the
Court has discerned from the evidence or even from the
investigation records that some other independent person has
witnessed any event connecting the incident in question then
there is justification for making adverse comments against
non-examination of such person as prosecution witness.
Otherwise, merely on surmises the Court should not castigate
a prosecution for not examining other persons of the locality
as prosecution witnesses. Prosecution can be expected to
examine only those who have witnessed the events and not
10
those who have not seen it though the neighborhood may be
replete with other residents also. [See: State of Rajasthan v.
Teja Ram and Ors. (AIR 1999 SC 1776)].