Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.21 seconds)Section 471 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 467 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sachida Nand Singh And Anr vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 3 February, 1998
The Protest Petition was dismissed and Final Report was
accepted. The Criminal Revision was filed by the appellant
challenging the order dated 12.03.2003. The Revisional Court
held that the provision of Section 195(1)(b)(ii) Cr.P.C. is
not applicable to the facts of the present case. The
Revisional Court has placed reliance on the judgment of this
court in Sachida Nand Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.,
(1998) 2 SCC 493, where it was held that when the document
before producing in the Court has been prepared in a forged
4
manner, provision of Section 195(1)(b)(ii) Cr.P.C. cannot be
made applicable. The Revisional Court set aside the order of
subordinate court and directed the court below to pass an
order in accordance with law, on the basis of evidence
available on file.
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Iqbal Singh Marwah & Anr vs Meenakshi Marwah & Anr on 11 March, 2005
8. We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel
for the parties and have perused the record. In so far as,
submission of the appellant regarding Section 195(1)(b)(ii)
Cr.P.C. the law is not well settled by the Constitution Bench
judgment that Section 195(1)(b)(ii) Cr.P.C. would be attracted
only when the offences enumerated in the said provision have
7
been committed with respect to a document after it has been
produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in any court.
The Constitution Bench in Iqbal Singh Marwah & Anr. Vs.
Meenakshi Marwah & Anr., (2005) 4 SCC 370 in para 33 & 34 had
held:
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1