Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)
Band Box Pvt. Ltd. vs Estate Officer Punjab & Sind Bank & Anr. on 13 July, 2012 cites

Indian Instt. Of Public Opinion Pvt Ltd vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 11 May, 2012

3. As far as the said argument is concerned, we have recently had an occasion to deal with the same in our judgment dated 23 rd March, 2012 in LPA No.977-80/2011titled Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Damyanti Verma and in our judgment dated 11 th May, 2012 in LPA No.9/20012 titled Indian Institute of Public Opinion Pvt. Ltd. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India. We have held that the said guidelines do not come in the way of resort to the provisions of the PP Act. Need is therefore not felt to discuss the said aspect in detail and suffice it is to state that we reiterate the view taken in the aforesaid two judgments.
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 16 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

Ashoka Marketing Ltd. And Anr. Etc. Etc vs Punjab National Bank And Ors. Etc. Etc on 7 August, 1990

6. The counsel for the appellant also raises a plea of discrimination. It is contended that while against certain other tenants, the respondent Bank had initiated proceedings under Section 14(1)(k) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, against the appellant the provisions of the PP Act have been resorted to. It is argued that there is no policy of the respondent Bank in this regard and the respondent Bank indulges in a policy of pick and choose in selecting the forum, whether before the Rent Controller or Civil Court or the Estate Officer for initiating proceedings against its tenants and of which the forum of Civil Court and Rent Controller is advantageous to the tenants/occupants. We are afraid, we do not find any merit in the said plea also. Once it is held that the jurisdiction of the Estate Officer was validly invoked, the same cannot be faulted with merely for the reason that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court or of the Rent Controller is invoked against others. There is no LPA No.250/2012 Page 3 of 6 concept of negative equality in law. We may however notice that the counsel for the respondent Bank has clarified that the proceedings against another tenant before the Rent Controller, instance whereof is given, were filed way back in the year 1986 when the law was not clear and avers that since the time the law has been settled in Ashoka Marketing Ltd. Vs. Punjab National Bank (1990) 4 SCC 406, the respondent Bank has not invoked the jurisdiction of any fora other than that of the Estate Officer.
Supreme Court of India Cites 93 - Cited by 530 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Damyanti Verma Decd Thr Lrs on 11 May, 2012

3. As far as the said argument is concerned, we have recently had an occasion to deal with the same in our judgment dated 23 rd March, 2012 in LPA No.977-80/2011titled Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Damyanti Verma and in our judgment dated 11 th May, 2012 in LPA No.9/20012 titled Indian Institute of Public Opinion Pvt. Ltd. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India. We have held that the said guidelines do not come in the way of resort to the provisions of the PP Act. Need is therefore not felt to discuss the said aspect in detail and suffice it is to state that we reiterate the view taken in the aforesaid two judgments.
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 15 - R S Endlaw - Full Document
1