Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.34 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 109 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
18. The Apex Court of Sharad Birdhichand Sarda AIR 1984
SC 1622 (supra), has laid down that before a case against the
accused based on circumstantial evidence can be said to be
fully established, the following conditions must be fulfilled.
Section 372 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Manjunath Chennabasapa Madalli vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2007
"11. It has been consistently laid down by this Court that
where a case rests squarely on circumstantial evidence, the
inference of guilt can be justified only when all the
incriminating facts and circumstances are found to be
incompatible with the innocence of the accused or the guilt of
any other person.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee vs State Of M.P. on 2 May, 1989
350); Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P (AIR 1989 SC
1890). The circumstances from which an inference as to the
guilt of the accused is drawn have to be proved beyond
reasonable doubt and have to be shown to be closely doubt
and have to be shown to be closely connected with the
principal fact sought to be inferred from those circumstances.
Bhagat Ram vs State Of Punjab on 9 February, 1954
In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab (AIR 1954 SC 621), it was
laid down that where the case depends upon the conclusion
drawn from circumstances the cumulative effect of the
circumstances must be such as to negative the innocence of
the accused and bring the offences home beyond any
reasonable doubt."
1