Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)X vs Y on 16 July, 2010
These matters are between the same parties. We shall
refer the parties by name. Aayisha married Ahad Haneefa as
per the muslim ceremonies and rites on 13.9.2018. She
approached the Family Court, Chavara,
in O.P.(MMA) No.950/2019 for a decree of divorce invoking
under Section 2(viii), (a) (d) of the Dissolution of Muslim
Marriage Act. On account of delay involved in consideration
of the above matter, she approached this Court in O.P.(FC)
No.90/2022. This Court,, taking note of the recognition of
the extra-judicial divorce permissible to muslim woman
invoking Khula as reported in X v. Y [2021 (2) KLT 967],
allowed her to invoke extra-judicial divorce and move the
Family Court to record the same. Accordingly, she resorted
to Khula and terminated the marriage. She approached the
Family Court to record the same in O.P.(MMA) 950/2019. The
Family Court after noting that all conditions of the Khula
have been fulfilled, recorded the same in
Mat.Appeal No.323/2022 & conn.cases 5
O..P(MMA)No.950/2019 as per the judgment dated 11.4.2022 and
disposed the above case. Challenging the recording of Khula,
Ahad Haneefa approached this Court in Mat.Appeal No.323/2022.
In the meanwhile, he also approached the Family Court,
Chavara, in O.P(Others).No.113/2022 challenging the extra-
judicial divorce invoked by Aayisha. In that, he filed
interlocutory applications restraining Aayisha from
contracting second marriage on the strength of Khula invoked
by her. The Family Court as per the order in the
interlocutory application granted interim injunction.
Aggrieved by the interim injunction, Ayisha approached this
Court in O.P.(FC) No.276/2022. This Court on 20.05.2022,
passed the following order:
1