Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.38 seconds)Rajasthan Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 2006
Section 135 in Bombay Police Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Maharashtra Police Act
The Arms Act, 1959
Pushkar Mukherjee & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal on 7 November, 1968
In Pushkar Mukharjee v. State of West
Bengal, (supra), it has been stated that:
Piyush Kantilal Mehta vs Commissioner Of Police, Ahmedabad City ... on 16 December, 1988
It has also been observed in a recent decision of the
Supreme Court in Piyush Kantilal Mehta v. The Commissioner
of Police, Ahmedabad City, (supra) that:
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia vs State Of Bihar And Others on 7 September, 1965
It does not
create or tend or create any panic in the mind of people of
particular locality or public in general nor it affects
adversely the maintenance of public order. There is nothing
to show that the above activities of the petitioner have
579
affected or tended to affect the even tempo of fife of the
community. An act may create a law and order problem but
such an act does not necessarily cause an obstruction to the
maintenance of public order. The difference between 'the law
and order and public order has been very succinctly stated
by this Court in Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar &
Ors., [966] 1 SCR 709 at page 746 wherein it has been stated
that: