Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.29 seconds)Section 10 in The U.P. Imposition Of Ceiling On Land Holdings Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The U.P. Imposition Of Ceiling On Land Holdings Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
State Of Gujarat vs Afsar Uddnkhan Masiuddinkhan Pathan on 24 February, 1998
In the said proceedings it was held that Afsar Ali did not hold any
irrigated land. However some area was declared surplus and the choice of the
tenure holder was also accepted and the matter stood concluded. After
insertion of Section 4-A in the Act by U. P. Act no. 2 of 1975, the prescribed
authority issued a fresh notice under Section 29 of the Act for re-determination
of the surplus land. Upon receiving the said notice under Section 29 of the Act
the petitioner's father Afsar Ali contested the notice claiming that the
provisions of Section 29 of the Act, were not attracted in his case as he had
neither inherited any land nor his grove land had ceased to be a grove land
nor any irrigation facility had become available to his land. The case was
registered as Case no. 1 of 1993-94 State Vs. Afsar Ali. The prescribed
authority by its order dated 29.12.1993 passed in the aforesaid case held that
the petitioner's father Afsar Ali had installed a boring in two places in his land
which were held jointly by Afsar Ali with other co-tenure holders and treating
the aforesaid boring as an irrigation facility held the land to be irrigated and
declared 2-810 acre of land of Afsar Ali surplus.