Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.05 seconds)

Prakash vs Phulavati . on 16 October, 2015

3. When the suit was set down for plaintiff's evidence, defendants 2, 3 and 6 filed application under Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to reject the plaint contending that under the provisions of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, giving the status of coparcener even to a daughter which hither to, prior to the said amendment was not available to a daughter, in view of the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the 5 case of Sri Prakash and others vs. Smt.Phulavathi and others reported in (2016)2 SCC 36. The said application was resisted by the plaintiff by filing objections. The Trial Court, considering the application and objections, by the impugned order, dismissed the application. Hence the present writ petition is filed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 59 - Cited by 270 - A K Goel - Full Document
1