Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.21 seconds)

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Sainderjit Kaur on 18 March, 2004

In any event, it is not a case where this Court should exercise its discretion in favour of the appellant. It is trite that in a given case, the Court may refuse to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constituiton. (See Chandra Singh and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another [(2003) 6 SCC 545] and State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Savinderjit Kaur [JT 2004 (3) SC 470] The scope of public interest litigation has recently been noticed by this Court in Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee and Another vs. C.K. Rajan and others [(2003) 7 SCC 546] holding :
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 14 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. & ... vs C.K. Rajan & Others on 14 August, 2003

In any event, it is not a case where this Court should exercise its discretion in favour of the appellant. It is trite that in a given case, the Court may refuse to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constituiton. (See Chandra Singh and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another [(2003) 6 SCC 545] and State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Savinderjit Kaur [JT 2004 (3) SC 470] The scope of public interest litigation has recently been noticed by this Court in Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee and Another vs. C.K. Rajan and others [(2003) 7 SCC 546] holding :
Supreme Court of India Cites 62 - Cited by 296 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next