Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.28 seconds)

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ... vs Bishal Jaiswal on 15 April, 2021

8. We may notice that in "Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited" (supra) in paragraph 35, as extracted above, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has clearly laid down that whether acknowledgment in balance sheet is acknowledgment within the meaning of Section 18 depends on the facts of each case and as to whether an entry made in a balance sheet qua any particular creditor is unequivocal or has been entered into with caveats, which then has to be examined on a case by case basis. The Adjudicating Authority having not examined the balance sheet for Financial Year 2016-17 ending on 31.03.2017. In the interest of justice, the Adjudicating Authority has to examine the balance sheet to find out as to whether it contain acknowledgment within the meaning of Section 18 of the Limitation Act or not.
Supreme Court of India Cites 87 - Cited by 107 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Ambica Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax Gujarat, ... on 30 August, 1963

In Ambika Mills Ltd. Ahmedabad v. CIT Gujarat (1964) 54 ITR 167, it was further held that a debt shown in a balance sheet of a company amounts to an acknowledgement for the purpose of Section 19 of the Limitation Act and in order to be so, the balance sheet in which such acknowledgement is made need not be addressed to the creditors. In light of these authorities, it must be held that in the present case, the disclosure by the assessee company in its balance sheet as on 31st March, 2002 of the accounts of the Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 388 of 2021 7 sundry creditors' amounts to an acknowledgement of the debts in their favour for the purposes of Section 18 of the Limitation Act. The assessee's liability to the creditors, thus, subsisted and did not cease nor was it remitted by the creditors. The liability was enforceable in a court of law."
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Dena Bank (Now Bank Of Baroda) vs C. Shivakumar Reddy on 4 August, 2021

In another recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Dena Bank vs. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Ors.- Civil Appeal No. 1650 of 2020", after referring to the judgment of "Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited" (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court again reiterated that Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is fully applicable to proceedings under 'I&B Code' and entries in books of accounts and/ or balance sheets of a Corporate Debtor would amount to an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act. In paragraph 118, following has been laid down:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 65 - Cited by 99 - I Banerjee - Full Document

Bengal Silk Mills Co. vs Ismail Golam Hossain Ariff on 17 April, 1961

In Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswall and Anr. (supra) authored by Nariman, J. this Court quoted with approval the judgments, inter alia, of Bengal Silk Mills Co. v. Ismail Golam Hossain Ariff ,18 ["Bengal Silk Mills"] and in Re Pandem Tea Co.19 Ltd., the judgment of the Delhi High Court in South Asia Industries (P) Ltd. v. General Krishna Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana20 and the judgment of Karnataka High Court in Hegde Golay Ltd. v. State Bank of India 21 and held that an acknowledgement of liability that is made in a Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 388 of 2021 8 balance sheet can amount to an acknowledgement of debt."
Calcutta High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 43 - R S Bachawat - Full Document

Hegde And Golay Limited vs State Bank Of India on 19 November, 1985

In Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswall and Anr. (supra) authored by Nariman, J. this Court quoted with approval the judgments, inter alia, of Bengal Silk Mills Co. v. Ismail Golam Hossain Ariff ,18 ["Bengal Silk Mills"] and in Re Pandem Tea Co.19 Ltd., the judgment of the Delhi High Court in South Asia Industries (P) Ltd. v. General Krishna Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana20 and the judgment of Karnataka High Court in Hegde Golay Ltd. v. State Bank of India 21 and held that an acknowledgement of liability that is made in a Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 388 of 2021 8 balance sheet can amount to an acknowledgement of debt."
Karnataka High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1   2 Next