Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.86 seconds)Indian National Congress (I) vs Institute Of Social Welfare & Ors on 10 May, 2002
5. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of both
sides, it is necessary to set out relevant parameters to confer status
or order as quasi-judicial order. The parameters as laid down by
the Apex Court in the case of Indian National Congress (Supra) are
as under:
Mayur Vasant Sonawane vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 21 April, 2022
3. Mr. Sanjay Shinde learned Advocate for the petitioner,
relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Indian
National Congress (I) Vs. Institute of Social Welfare & Ors,
reported in (2002) 5 SCC 685 and the Full Bench judgment of this
Court in the case of Mayur Vasant Sonawane Vs. State of
Maharashtra and Another, reported in (2022) 3 Mah LJ 334,
contended that the order passed by the Secretary is a quasi-judicial
order. According to him, to confer the status of quasi-judicial order,
there doesn't need to be lis between two parties. The affidavit filed
by the Board states that the impugned order is passed after
allowing the contesting parties to hear. According to him, the
impugned order satisfies the parameter of a dispute between the
authority and the subject and, therefore, the order needs to be
termed a quasi-judicial order.
Section 4 in The Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal And Other Manual Workers (Regulation Of Employment And Welfare) Act, 1969 [Entire Act]
1