Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.33 seconds)

Assistant Commissioner vs Bhima Shiddappa Naik on 25 March, 1994

3. It is not in dispute no period is prescribed under the Act for filing an application under Section 18(3)(b) of the Act. It is now well-settled that Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act applies to an application under Section 18(3)(b) of the Act which provides the period of limitation in respect of an application not provided elsewhere. Therefore, three years is the period prescribed under Article 137 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act and therefore three years is the period prescribed for an application under Section 18(3)(b) of the Act. The question is whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable if such an application is not filed within three years. A Division Bench of this Court in Assistant Commissioner's case, supra, has considered the said question and has held as under.--
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 4 - T S Thakur - Full Document
1