Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.40 seconds)

Vernon vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 July, 2023

In Vernon v. The State of Maharashtra, 2023 INSC 655, [para 45], while granting bail under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2002, Supreme 4 4 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 17-09-2023 19:31:04 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:113454 CRM-M-11559-2023 2023:PHHC:113454 Court had directed imposition of the similar condition, which reads as follows, "(d) Both the appellants shall use only one Mobile Phone each, during the time they remain on bail and shall inform the Investigating Officer of the NIA, their respective mobile numbers."
Supreme Court of India Cites 40 - Cited by 101 - A Bose - Full Document

Madhu Tanwar And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 29 May, 2023

In Madhu Tanwar and Anr. v. State of Punjab, 2023:PHHC:077618 [Para 10, 21], CRM-M-27097-2023, decided on 29-05-2023, this court observed, [10] The exponential growth in technology and artificial intelligence has transformed identification techniques remarkably. Voice, gait, and facial recognition are incredibly sophisticated and pervasive. Impersonation, as we know it traditionally, has virtually become impossible. Thus, the remedy lies that whenever a judge or an officer believes that the accused might be a flight risk or has a history of fleeing from justice, then in such cases, appropriate conditions can be inserted that all the expenditure that shall be incurred to trace them, shall be recovered from such person, and the State shall have a lien over their assets to make good the loss.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 147 - A Chitkara - Full Document
1