Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.17 seconds)

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana vs Jagdev Singh on 29 July, 2016

So also in High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Ors. vs. Jadadev Singh [(2016) 14 SCC 267] it has been held that the principle enunciated in proposition (ii) will not apply to employees who furnished undertaking while opting for revised pay that he would refund the excess amount received. Here of-course recovery order was cancelled by Annexure A8 itself. So the Tribunal is perfectly justified in setting aside the offending part in Annexure A8 modifying the scale as Rs.18740-33680 instead of Rs.19240-34500 as on 01-02-2010 and in the scale of pay of Rs.36,600-79,200 with effect from 01.02.2015 (Revised Scale of pay-2014) as well Annexure A9 the consequential order. Therefore, his O.P(KAT)No.268 of 2017 9 pensionary benefits have to be computed accordingly.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 921 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1