Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)
Ramakantha Khadigar vs The State on 30 August, 1956 cites

Sunder Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 3 November, 1955

3. Under Clauses (a) and (b) of Article 134(1) an appeal lies, as a matter of right, against the judgment of a High Court in a criminal proceedings, in respect of cases which come within the scope of these two clauses. But a certificate under Clause (c) of Article 134(1) stands on a different footing. As pointed out by the Supreme Court in Sunder Singh v. State of U. P. AIR 1956 SC 411 (B):
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 85 - Full Document

Pritam Singh vs The State on 5 May, 1950

4. The earliest pronouncement of the Supreme Court on the subject is to be found in Pritam Singh v. The State, AIR 1950 SC 169 (C). Doubtless that case related to the grant of special leave by the Supreme Court under Article 136, but the principles laid down therein would apply with equal force when the High Court has to deal with the question of granting a certificate under Article 134(1)(c).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 57 - S S Ali - Full Document

Arjuna Misra vs The Indian Union on 28 April, 1950

9. The next case cited by Mr. Palit was a Division Bench decision of this Court (Panigrahi C. J. and Mohapatra J.) reported in ILR (1954) Cut 537: (AIR 1954 Orissa 248) (A). The material facts of that case are as follows: One Maheshwar Dehuri was prosecuted under Section 224, Penal Code, in the Court of the First Class Magistrate, Baripada, who acquitted him and passed strictures on some Police Officers including Shri S.K. Ghosh, the Superintendent of Police, observing that they had instituted a false case against the said Maheshwar Dehuri and that they had ante-dated the F. I. R. in that case.
Orissa High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1