cites: 125046852

1 - 10 of 11 (0.75 seconds)

Santosh Kumar Sidar vs Mahindra & Mahindra Finance Service Ltd on 1 September, 2017 cites

The Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 22662

The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 30941

Beverly Park Maintenance Services Ltd. vs Kashmir Fab Styles Pvt. Ltd. on 13 March, 2014

In Beverly Park Maintenance Services Ltd. Vs. Kashmir Fab Styles Pvt. Ltd. II (2014) CPJ 109 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission, has observed that "Once respondent participated in proceedings before arbitrator for same relief, proceedings for similar relief could not have been initiated before State Commission."

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 4 - Cited by 21 - Full Document

Section 3 in Consumer Protection Act, 2019 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1465

Section 3 in The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 1855

Vishnu Chandra Sharma vs Sriram Finance Company Ltd. & Anr. on 20 March, 2017

In Vishnu Chandra Sharma Vs. Sriram Finance Company Ltd. and Another, 2017 (2) CPR 277 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission has observed thus :-

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 10 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Chandresh Kumar vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. on 29 February, 2016

In Chandresh Kumar Vs. Kotak Mahendra Bank Ltd. I (2017) CPJ 121 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission has observed thus :-

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 2 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 17483

T. Srinivas & Anr. vs M/S. Srija Construction on 19 November, 2015

In T. Srinivas & Anr. Vs. Srija Constructions, I (2016) CPJ 552 (NC), Hon'ble National Commission has observed thus :-

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 12 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Section 17 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 5048

1 2 Next