cites: 1251591

Jai Prakash Gupta (D) Thr.Lrs vs Riyaz Ahamad & Anr on 28 October, 2009

In Jai Prakash Gupta's case (supra) the Hon'ble apex court, while dealing with the subsequent development of facts and law having a material bearing on the entitlement of parties to relief, held that even at any stage of the proceeding court cannot be precluded from taking a conscious decision , relief can be appropriately moulded, based on subsequent events.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 25 - T Chatterjee - Full Document

Swaroop Devi (Smt.) And Anr. vs Murti Bhagwan Satya Narainji on 1 October, 2007

In Swaroop Devi (Smt.) 's case (supra) it has ; been held that the learned Judge refused to interfere in the finding of the facts while deciding the second appeal and it was a case of determination of the question of relationship of the landlord and tenant, and were a concurrent finding of facts by both the courts below.

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 40 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Shantilal Thakordas & Ors vs Chimanlal Maganlal Telwala on 23 August, 1976

Shantilal Thakordas' case (supra) the question was that when there was the pleading regarding the reasonable and bonafide requirement of suit premises for the firm, and where the landlord who was a partner in the firm died, and a new firm was constituted the question of reasonable and bonafide necessity cannot be said to be ceased.

Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 75 - N L Untwalia - Full Document

Gaya Prasad vs Shri Pradeep Srivastava on 7 February, 2001

In Gaya Prasad's case (supra) the Hon'ble apex court held that the crucial date for deciding bona- fides of the need is date of application subsequent 17 developments occurred, pendente lite can be taken into account, only when need of landlord is completely eclipsed by such subsequent events.

Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 297 - Full Document

Shakuntala Bai & Ors vs Narayan Das & Ors on 5 May, 2004

In Shakuntala Bai's case (supra), it has been held that the bonfide need of the landlord has to be examined as on the date of institution of proceedings and if a decree for eviction is passed, the death of the landlord during the pendency of the appeal preferred by the tenant, will make no difference as his heirs are fully entitled to defend the suit.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 74 - G P Mathur - Full Document

Kamleshwar Prasad vs Pradumanju Agrawal (Dead) By Lrs on 2 April, 1997

Shakuntala Bai & Ors. v. Narayan Das & Ors. [2004 AIR SCW, 3291] Kamleshwar Prasad v. Pradumanju Agarwal (dead) by LRS.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 76 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

G. C. Kapoor vs Nand Kumar Bhasin & Ors on 20 November, 2001

[(1997) 4 SCC 413] G.C.Kapoor v. Nand Kumar Bhasin & Ors. [(2002) 1 SCC 610] Madan Lal v. Nanasaheb [2008 (2) RCJ, (SC) 224] 12 Pratap Rai Tanwani & Anr. v. Uttam Chand & Anr. [2004 AIR SCW 6858] Naresh Chand v. Smt.Premlata Bakshi [2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 423] R.K.Nair v. Saramma George & Ors. [2006 (1) RCJ 201] Dattatray Laxman Kamble v. Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkune & Anr. [1999 (2) CCC 115 (SC)] Raghunath G.Panhale (dead) by LRS.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 132 - Full Document

Pratap Rai Tanwani And Anr vs Uttam Chand And Anr on 8 September, 2004

[(1997) 4 SCC 413] G.C.Kapoor v. Nand Kumar Bhasin & Ors. [(2002) 1 SCC 610] Madan Lal v. Nanasaheb [2008 (2) RCJ, (SC) 224] 12 Pratap Rai Tanwani & Anr. v. Uttam Chand & Anr. [2004 AIR SCW 6858] Naresh Chand v. Smt.Premlata Bakshi [2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 423] R.K.Nair v. Saramma George & Ors. [2006 (1) RCJ 201] Dattatray Laxman Kamble v. Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkune & Anr. [1999 (2) CCC 115 (SC)] Raghunath G.Panhale (dead) by LRS.

Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 101 - A Pasayat - Full Document

R.K.Nair vs Saramma George on 3 January, 2006

[(1997) 4 SCC 413] G.C.Kapoor v. Nand Kumar Bhasin & Ors. [(2002) 1 SCC 610] Madan Lal v. Nanasaheb [2008 (2) RCJ, (SC) 224] 12 Pratap Rai Tanwani & Anr. v. Uttam Chand & Anr. [2004 AIR SCW 6858] Naresh Chand v. Smt.Premlata Bakshi [2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 423] R.K.Nair v. Saramma George & Ors. [2006 (1) RCJ 201] Dattatray Laxman Kamble v. Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkune & Anr. [1999 (2) CCC 115 (SC)] Raghunath G.Panhale (dead) by LRS.

Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 3 - S R Singharavelu - Full Document

Dattatraya Laxman Kamble vs Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkunde & Anr on 28 April, 1999

[(1997) 4 SCC 413] G.C.Kapoor v. Nand Kumar Bhasin & Ors. [(2002) 1 SCC 610] Madan Lal v. Nanasaheb [2008 (2) RCJ, (SC) 224] 12 Pratap Rai Tanwani & Anr. v. Uttam Chand & Anr. [2004 AIR SCW 6858] Naresh Chand v. Smt.Premlata Bakshi [2009 (1) DNJ (Raj.) 423] R.K.Nair v. Saramma George & Ors. [2006 (1) RCJ 201] Dattatray Laxman Kamble v. Abdul Rasul Moulali Kotkune & Anr. [1999 (2) CCC 115 (SC)] Raghunath G.Panhale (dead) by LRS.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 204 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results