Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.18 seconds)

New India Assurance Company Limited vs Trilochan Jane on 9 December, 2009

In support of their arguments, Ld. Counsel for defendant referred and relied upon the case of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in titled "New India Assurance Company (appellant) Vs. Trilochan Jane (respondent) in C.D Case No. 60/2001 of Orissa Order dated 09.12.2009" wherein it was held as under:­ Malkit Singh Vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. 15 /19 The respondent did not care to inform the insurance company about the theft for a period of 09 days, which could be fatal to the investigation. The delay in lodging the FIR after 2 days of the coming to know of the theft and 09 days to the insurance company, can be fatal as, in the meantime, the car could have traveled a long distance or may have been dismantled by that time and sold to kabaadi (scrap dealer).
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 2 - Cited by 274 - Full Document

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Bhagchand Saini on 4 December, 2014

31. Ld. counsel for defendant has also relied upon the case of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi in titled "HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant) Vs. Bhagchand Saini (respondent) Revision Petition No. 3049 of 2014 and IA/4956/2014 date of decision 04.12.2014" in that case the tractor in question was stolen on 06.12.2011 and intimation about the theft was given to the local police on 08.12.2011 i.e. 02 days after the incident. The intimation was given to the insurance company after a gap of 98 days. The revision petition was accepted and claim of the complainant for was rejected.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 8 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nitin Khandelwal on 8 May, 2008

32. Ld. counsel for plaintiff on the other hand referred and relied upon the case of Supreme Court of India in case titled "National Insurance Co. Malkit Singh Vs. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. 16 /19 Ltd. Vs. Nitin Khandelwal date of decision 08.05.2008 appeal (civil) 3409/2008" wherein it was held that in case of theft of vehicle, the breach of condition is not germane. In that case the vehicle has been snatched or stolen, therefore, the appellant company was held liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle when the insurer has obtained comprehensive policy for the loss caused to the insurer.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 458 - D Bhandari - Full Document
1