Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.48 seconds)
Snehdeep Krida Mandal Th. Chairman, P K ... vs Maharashtra Housing And Area ... on 17 April, 2025 cites

State Of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak & Anr on 28 July, 1982

12.2) A mere perusal of the Order would reveal that Respondent No.3's Advocate had not pointed out that, the Writ Petition is filed in this Court regarding same illegal structure and the reply to the Petition filed by the BMC, to the learned Judge of City Civil Court. According to us, if the Order had incorrectly recorded or not recorded a fact, plea or conduct that transpired, it ought to have been brought to the attention of the Court, while the matter was still fresh, to correct the record. We can only accept the Order as it reads and cannot imply or accept contentions raised across the bar that are not recorded in the Order. We are bound to accept the wordings of the Order as recorded, as they are conclusive and 15/32 ::: Uploaded on - 17/04/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 17/04/2025 22:27:42 ::: sns 16-oswp-2174-2024-J (F) .doc unquestionable. Our view gets support from the decision of Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharashtra vs Ramdas Shrinivas Nayak and Anr. reported in (1982) 2 SCC 463, which enumerates as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 529 - O C Reddy - Full Document

Abdul Razzaq Sunesra vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 17 July, 2013

19.1) We are unable to accept the unconditional apology tendered by Mr. Mahamuni. Affidavits are only like lip service. There is a growing trend of filing such Suits and obtaining injunctions on notices by suppressing material facts and law. This vindicates the apprehension expressed by the counsel for BMC in the case of Abdul Karim Ahmed Mansoori (supra) in paragraph No.10 as mentioned hereinabove. We see an urgent need to stem this. We therefore refer his case to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa to take necessary action for professional misconduct against Mr. Mahamuni as per Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961.
Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 Next