Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.39 seconds)

Srimati Giribala Dasi vs Kalidas Bhanja on 3 July, 1920

16. It is, however, argued by Mr. Pratap, that the ruling of the Privy Council in Giribala's case cannot be relied upon inasmuch as, it has not taken into consideration the provisions of Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act and the provisions of Section 29 of the Contract Act, According to Mr. Pratap, that decision is based only on the provisions of Section 21(c) of the since repealed Specific Relief Act of 1877. Mr. Pratap further argues that if we import the provisions of Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act, into the agreement in question, we could certainly fix the date of the commencement of the lease from the date of the making of the lease. I am unable to agree with the submission of Mr. Pratap.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Kailas Chandra Bhaumick And Ors. vs Bejoy Kanta Lahiri Chowdhury And Anr. on 13 May, 1915

25. We are then left with the fact that as appears from the decision in Kailas Chandra's case and the case of Raja of Vizianagaram, the Calcutta and the Madras High Courts have taken the view that the provisions of Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act could be imported into an agreement to lease for ascertaining' the date of the commencement of the tenancy.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next