Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Section 67 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 68 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
In H.Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N.Thimmajamma and
others , the Supreme Court held that the question as to whether the
Will set up by the propounder to be the last Will of the testator has to
be decided in the light of the provisions of Sections 67 and 68 of the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 58 and 63 of the 1925 Act
and that the reasonable test to be applied would be the usual test of
satisfaction of the prudent mind to such matters. The Court further
held that the propounder would be called upon to show by satisfactory
evidence that the Will was signed by the testator, that the testator at
the relevant time was in a sound and disposing state of mind, that he
understood the nature and effect of the dispositions and his signature
to the document is of his own free will. It was also held that
ordinarily when the evidence is disinterested and that the testator has
signed the document as required by law, the Courts shall be justified
in making a finding in favour of the propounder. The Court further
held that there may however be suspicious circumstances surrounding
the Will rendering the same invalid.
The Indian Succession Act, 1925
The Registration Act, 1908
1