Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)
Prahaladbhai Apaji Shankhla vs State Of Gujarat on 30 March, 2026 cites

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

9. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application, so also taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR and the sessions case against the applicant-accused would be an unnecessary harassment to the applicant-accused. It further appears that the trial would be a futile exercise and further continuing with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR and the sessions case would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR as well as the proceedings of the Sessions case, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Sanhita, 2023.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Madan Mohan Abbot vs State Of Punjab on 26 March, 2008

9. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application, so also taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR and the sessions case against the applicant-accused would be an unnecessary harassment to the applicant-accused. It further appears that the trial would be a futile exercise and further continuing with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR and the sessions case would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR as well as the proceedings of the Sessions case, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Sanhita, 2023.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 14260 - H S Bedi - Full Document

Nikhil Merchant vs C.B.I. & Anr on 20 August, 2008

9. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties as well as considering the facts and circumstances arising out of the present application, so also taking into consideration the decisions rendered in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, Page 4 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC) as well as State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, it appears that continuing further with the criminal proceedings in relation to the impugned FIR and the sessions case against the applicant-accused would be an unnecessary harassment to the applicant-accused. It further appears that the trial would be a futile exercise and further continuing with the proceedings pursuant to the impugned FIR and the sessions case would amount to abuse of process of law. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, the impugned FIR as well as the proceedings of the Sessions case, so also all other consequential proceedings arising pursuant thereto are required to be quashed and set aside in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page 5 of 6 Uploaded by MS.PARUL DUTTA(HCD0073) on Wed Apr 01 2026 Downloaded on : Wed Apr 01 23:35:12 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION R/CR.MA/5876/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026 undefined Sanhita, 2023.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 14306 - A Kabir - Full Document
1