Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.51 seconds)Section 15 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Maulvi Reza Ansari And Ors. vs Shyamlal Sah And Ors. on 19 April, 1983
23. It is no doubt true that in the decision referred Reza Ansari v. Shyamlal Sah (supra), a Division Bench of Patna High Court had arrived at the conclusion that in execution proceedings of decree passed in suit for possession of Wakf property after Wakf Act came into force in State of Bihar, the same cannot be instituted by Mutawalli of Wakf property.
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board vs Hathija Ammal (Dead) By Lrs. Etc. Etc on 31 August, 2001
Reliance also was placed on the decision of the Apex Court referred Tamil Nadu Wakf Board v. Hathiji Ammal (supra), but this decision is not on the point.
Section 112 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Manjula Varsheney And Another vs A.P. State Wakf Board And Others on 9 December, 1999
In the decision referred Manjula Varsheney v. A.P. State Wakf Board, (supra), while dealing with a legal notice terminating the lease of Wakf property issued by the Wakf Board under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act in exercise of powers under Section 32 of the Wakf Act, 1995, one of us (B. Sudershan Reddy, J.) had observed:
Moideen Bibi Ammal By Agent Montana ... vs Rathnavelu Mudali on 2 September, 1926
In view of the reasons recorded above, we are not inclined to follow the view expressed by the Division Bench of Patna High Court referred Reza Ansari v. Shyamlal Sah, (supra), and we are inclined to follow the view expressed in the decisions Badagam Jumayath Palli Dharas Committee v. P. Ummerkutty Haji, and also Moideen Bibi Ammal v. Rathnavelu Mudali, supra.