Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 41 (0.34 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Gopal Krishna Behera vs State Of Odisha And Ors. .... Opp. ... on 13 September, 2021
30. On 01.06.2018, a prayer was made for clubbing the
present probate petition and the separate revocation application
PC No. 5929/16 in case titled 'Gopal Krishan Khera Vs. State
& Ors.' on the ground that same evidence was to be led in both
the cases. The same was not opposed by the opposite counsel
and consequently the verbal request for common evidence was
allowed. The common evidence was led in these two cases. In
the present petition, the petitioner examined total three
witnesses. Since the common evidence were led so the
evidences led in revocation petition (PC No. 5929/16) shall also
be considered. In the revocation petition, petitioner herein
examined himself as R2W1.
Section 238 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Wakf Act, 1995
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
In H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma and
Others:AIR 1959 SC 443 Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has
observed that propounder to succeed and prove the Will is
required to prove by satisfactory evidence that (i) the Will was
signed by the testator; (ii) the testator at the time was in a sound
and disposing state of mind; (iii) the testator understood the
nature and effect of the dispositions; and (iv) that the testator
had put his signatures on the document of his own free will.