Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
15. The abovesaid view is only a reiteration of the view expressed by the
Supreme Court in Associate Builders v. DDA, (2015) 3 SCC 49.
Swan Gold Mining Ltd vs Hindustan Copper Ltd on 22 September, 2014
Ssangyong Engineering And ... vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 8 May, 2019
In Ssangyong Engineering Construction Co. Ltd. vs.
National Highways Authority of India reported as 2019 SCCOnline
SC 677, the Supreme Court has reiterated the aforesaid view in the
following words: -
Section 18 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Ministry Of Youth Affairs & Sports vs Swiss Timing Ltd on 21 October, 2019
6. At the outset, we may delineate the scope of interference in a Section
37 petition, as discussed by us in a recent judgment in FAO (OS) (COMM)
296/2019, Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports vs. Swiss Timing Ltd.,
reported as 2019 SCC Online Del. 10934 the relevant paras whereof are
reproduced herein below:-
Section 48 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Sutlej Construction Limited vs Union Territory Of Chandigarh on 5 December, 2017
In Sutlej Construction Limited
Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh reported as (2018) 1 SCC 718
the Supreme Court has held as follows: -
M/S. Harish Chandra & Company vs State Of U.P. Thr. Superintending Eng on 8 September, 2016
1