Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (1.41 seconds)
Tata Tea Limited And Anr vs Tata Tea Limited (Bombay) Employees ... on 7 March, 2017 cites

Nedungadi Bank Ltd vs K.P. Madhavankutty And Ors on 28 January, 2000

31) In the case of Nedungadi Bank Limited Vs. K.P.Madhavantutty and ors., the workman was dismissed after lawfully and properly conducting the disciplinary proceedings against him. His dismissal was upheld in the appeal and the benefits legally due to him were paid to him. The ::: Uploaded on - 14/03/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 15/03/2017 00:10:01 ::: 39 said workman, after seven long years, raised a dispute against his dismissal on the ground that two other employees dismissed in similar situation, were reinstated. In these circumstances, it was held by the Honourable Apex Court that reference of the said dispute after about seven and half years was bad; both on the grounds of delay as well as non existence of an industrial dispute. Moreover, as observed by the Hon'ble Apex court under what circumstances the said two employees were dismissed and subsequently reinstated was nowhere mentioned by the concerned workman. It is evident that the observations made and the law laid down in the aforesaid judgment cannot be made applicable to the facts of the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 553 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next