Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Section 3 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Smt. Momina Khatum And Ors. on 19 March, 2008
14. A reading of Section 10(1) together with clause (b) of the fourth
proviso of the Act makes it clear that the failure of the injured workman or
dependents of the deceased workman as the case may be, to serve notice of
accident on the employer is not fatal to the claim of compensation preferred
by the workman or its dependents if the employer had the knowledge of
factum of accident. Reference in this regard is made to judgment of this
Court in FAO 268/2004 titled as The New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Smt.
Momina Khatum and Ors decided on 19.03.2008.
The Competition Act, 2002
Pradesh Mining Corporation vs Munde Kol on 11 July, 1989
In Pradesh Mining Corporation vs. Munde Kol: II(1990)ACC
127, one of the contentions raised was that claim was not maintainable in
the absence of notice required to be given by the employee under section 10
of the Act, as such the impugned order was liable to be set aside. The
Madhya Pradesh High Court considered the aforesaid contention and
observed as under:-
1