Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.17 seconds)

J & K Public Service Commission vs Dr Narinder Mohan on 7 December, 1993

In similar circumstances, this Court had considered the entire controversy in J & K Public Service Commission & Ors. vs Dr. Narinder Mohan & Ors. [ (1994) 2 SCC 630]. Abmittedly, the post of doctors in the Central Government Health Scheme are required to be filled up by recruitment through Union Public Service Commission. Therefore, the direction to consider the case of the respondent in consultation with the Public Service Commission for regularisation is in violation of the statutory rules and Article 320 of the Constitution of India. The only course Known to law is that the Union of India shall be required to notify the recruitment to the Public Service Commission and Union Public Service commission shall conduct the examination inviting the applications from all the eligible persons including the persons like the respondents, It would be for the respondent to apply for and seek selection in accordance with Rules. Therefore, the direction is in violation of Article of Article 320 of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 255 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Jacob M. Puthuparambil And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Kerala Water Authority And Ors. Etc. Etc on 19 September, 1990

The learned counsel for the respondent seeks to place reliance on the directions issued by this Court in Jacob M. Puthuparambil vs. Kerala Water Authority [(1987) Supp, SCC 497]. It is seen that the Public Service Commission was required to recruit the candidates and, therefore, the additional Medical Officers wording in the Railway Department in the latter case were directed to be regularised in consultation with the Union Public Service Commission, It would be seen that when the recruitment was to be made in accordance with the procedure prescribed by the Public Service Commission in terms of the statutory Rules made under Article 320 of the Constitution, necessarily the recruitment is required to be made in that manner and in no other manner. Therefore, this Court did not intend to by-pass the above procedure in regularisation of their services.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 315 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document
1