Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (3.95 seconds)

The Union Of India vs Smt.R.K. Kulkarni on 27 November, 2018

In the case of R.K. Kulkarni (supra), the fact situation is identical to the case on hand, wherein the applicant therein was appointed on 25.10.1973 in the Postal Department as a Departmental Staff Vender; appointed as Postal Assistant on 25.03.1978 after clearing the departmental test; financial upgradation under TBOP was extended on completion of 16 years of service on 27.03.1994; and thereafter, benefits under BCR scheme was extended on completion of 26 years service. The Tribunal having allowed her application by holding that she was entitled to the benefits of MACP-III, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order passed in the said case allowed the writ petition holding that the 9 W.P.No.(C)4131/2014, D.D. 05.08.2014 16 applicant therein was not entitled to the MACP-III benefits. In the said decision, it was held that the appointment of the applicant therein to the post of Postal Assistant based on the LDCE cannot be considered as a case of direct recruitment, but as a case of promotion.
Karnataka High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 14 - B V Nagarathna - Full Document
1   2 Next