Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.28 seconds)

D.Venkatasubramaniam & Ors vs M.K.Mohan Krishnamachari & Ors on 14 September, 2009

Mr. A.K. Walia, learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that in spite of the fact that Superintendent of Police entrusted the investigation and the FIR has been registered against SHO Sarabjit Singh and the SHO has been suspended from service and Section 447 IPC has been added in the FIR No. 154 dated 6.10.2009. He is not satisfied with the way investigation will be carried out. He submits that once the investigation has been conducted by the local police in a biased manner, the investigation should be transferred to CBI or other independent agency outside the District. In broad day light his shops were looted and the possession was taken forcibly in connivance with the police by the private respondents. He has placed reliance on the judgments of the Honb'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kedar Narayan Pardia & Ors. vs. State of Orissa & Anr. 2009(4) RCR Criminal 479 and D. Venkatasubramaniam & Ors. vs. M.K. Mohan Mkrishnamachari & Anr. 2009(4) RCR (Crl.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 152 - B S Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next