Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 38 (0.69 seconds)State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
Above Category 7 is clearly attracted in the
facts of the present case. Although, the High Court
has noted the judgment of State of
Haryana v. Bhajan Lal [State of Haryana v. Bhajan
Lal, 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 426] ,
but did not advert to the relevant facts of the present
case, materials on which final report was submitted
by the IO. We, thus, are fully satisfied that the
present is a fit case where the High Court ought to
have exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482
CrPC and quashed the criminal proceedings".
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 81 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 79 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sharat Babu Digumarti vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 14 December, 2016
These are the definition sections under
the special Act. The penalty has been prescribed under section 10 of the
said Act. The concerned Court has not taken cognizance under section 10
of the special Act. It is well settled that when special Act is there, the
sections of IPC are not attracted as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
the case of "Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi)"