Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.48 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shabana Bano vs Imran Khan on 4 December, 2009
After considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Shamima Farooqui (supra) which has
referred the judgments rendered in the cases of Shamim Bano
Vs. Asraf Khan reported in (2014) 12 SCC 636 and Shabana
Bano Vs. Imran Khan reported in (2009) 1 SCC 666, we are of
the firm opinion that a Muslim divorced woman is unquestionably
entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. after the
Iddat period as long as she does not remarry and if she is
otherwise so entitled. Thus, the learned Family Court has
committed a grave error in law while modifying the Order dated
06.08.1999 awarding maintenance in favour of the petitioner-wife
under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Criminal Misc. Case No. 183/91.
The Muslim Women (Protection Of Rights On Divorce) Act, 1986
Section 3 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Shamima Farooqui vs Shahid Khan on 6 April, 2015
After considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Shamima Farooqui (supra) which has
referred the judgments rendered in the cases of Shamim Bano
Vs. Asraf Khan reported in (2014) 12 SCC 636 and Shabana
Bano Vs. Imran Khan reported in (2009) 1 SCC 666, we are of
the firm opinion that a Muslim divorced woman is unquestionably
entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. after the
Iddat period as long as she does not remarry and if she is
otherwise so entitled. Thus, the learned Family Court has
committed a grave error in law while modifying the Order dated
06.08.1999 awarding maintenance in favour of the petitioner-wife
under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Criminal Misc. Case No. 183/91.
Section 19 in The Family Courts Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
Shamim Bano vs Asraf Khan on 16 April, 2014
After considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of Shamima Farooqui (supra) which has
referred the judgments rendered in the cases of Shamim Bano
Vs. Asraf Khan reported in (2014) 12 SCC 636 and Shabana
Bano Vs. Imran Khan reported in (2009) 1 SCC 666, we are of
the firm opinion that a Muslim divorced woman is unquestionably
entitled to get maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. after the
Iddat period as long as she does not remarry and if she is
otherwise so entitled. Thus, the learned Family Court has
committed a grave error in law while modifying the Order dated
06.08.1999 awarding maintenance in favour of the petitioner-wife
under Section 125 Cr.P.C. in Criminal Misc. Case No. 183/91.
1