Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.25 seconds)

Abdul Subhan vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 27 September, 2006

22. This Court as well has time and again taken the view that the allegation of offending vehicle being driven in a high speed/fast manner does not ipso facto establish commission of a rash and negligent act for the purposes of Sections 279/304A IPC. [Refer: Abdul Subhan v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as 2006 SCC OnLine Del 1132, Raj Kumar v. State (NCT Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA CRL.M.C. ANAND 6402/2019 Page 11 of 15 Signing Date:05.08.2022 14:58:00 of Delhi), CRL.REV.P. 402/2006 and Ram Chander v. State, CRL.REV.P. 686/2017].
Delhi High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 1083 - B D Ahmed - Full Document

Ram Chander vs R.K. Khattar And Anr. [Along With Crl. ... on 18 November, 2006

22. This Court as well has time and again taken the view that the allegation of offending vehicle being driven in a high speed/fast manner does not ipso facto establish commission of a rash and negligent act for the purposes of Sections 279/304A IPC. [Refer: Abdul Subhan v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as 2006 SCC OnLine Del 1132, Raj Kumar v. State (NCT Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SANGEETA CRL.M.C. ANAND 6402/2019 Page 11 of 15 Signing Date:05.08.2022 14:58:00 of Delhi), CRL.REV.P. 402/2006 and Ram Chander v. State, CRL.REV.P. 686/2017].
Delhi High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 15 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1   2 3 Next