Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.17 seconds)

Thrissur District Co-Operative Bank ... vs Delson Davis P. And Ors. on 15 January, 2002

5 Mr Vikramjit Banerjee, learned Additional Solicitor General has relied upon a decision of a two-judge Bench of this Court in Thrissur District Co-operative Bank Limited v Delson Davis P2. The Additional Solicitor General submitted that once the process of selection had been completed with the appointment of G Vijender, the Select List stood exhausted. Hence, the subsequent dismissal of the appointed candidate from service would not result in the revival of the Select List. Hence, it was urged that 1 Tribunal 2 2002 (2) SLR 410 3 both the Tribunal and the High Court have erred in coming to the conclusion that the respondent had a vested right to appointment. 6 On the other hand, it has been urged on behalf of the respondent by Mr M Venkanna, learned counsel, that the candidate who had been appointed had secured his appointment through fraudulent means and, hence, the appointment was void ab initio. Learned counsel submitted that it was, strictly speaking, not necessary for the Department to hold a departmental enquiry and a simple order of termination with a notice to show cause would have sufficed. Hence, it was urged that it was the respondent, who was second in the order of merit, who should have been appointed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

State Of Punjab vs Raghbir Chand Sharma & Anr on 30 October, 2001

“When once the selection process is complete and appointment had been made, that process comes to an end and if any vacancy arises on the appointee having joined the post leaves the same, it must be treated as a fresh vacancy and fresh steps in accordance with the appropriate rules should be taken. This view is fortified by the judgment of this Court in State of Punjab v. Raghubir Chand Sharma and Anr. [JT 2001 (9) SC 266]”
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 96 - Full Document
1